Tuesday, 12 March 2013

LSL Market Review – 12th Mar 2013

Indices gained on the back of improved buying activity on blue-chips such as John Keells Holdings, Commercial Bank and Ceylon Tobacco Company. National Development Bank rose by around Rs. 3.00 on relatively thin volumes as investors expect a lump sum final dividend. Foreign buying on blue-chips have driven the market from last year’s low levels and we expect this trend to continue in the mid-term.

ASI gained 27.01 points (0.48%) to close at 5,704.32 and the S&P SL20 index gained 17.90 points (0.55%) to close at 3,247.09. Turnover was Rs. 671.6Mn.

Top contributors to turnover were John Keells Holdings with Rs. 347.6Mn, Commercial Bank with Rs. 56.9Mn and Hatton National Bank non-voting with Rs. 26.7Mn. Most active counters for the day were Asiri Surgical, John Keells Holdings and Commercial Bank.

Notable gainers for the day were Asiri Surgical up by 18.1% to close at Rs. 11.10, Seylan Developments up by 5.8% to close at Rs. 9.10 and Commercial Leasing & Finance up by 4.8% to close at Rs. 4.40. Notable losers for the day were PC Pharma down by 7.1% to close at Rs. 7.80, PC House down by 2.4% to close at Rs. 4.00 and Lanka Cement down by 2.4% to close at Rs. 8.00.

Cash map for today was 53.44%. Foreign participation was 35.23% of total market turnover whilst net foreign buying was Rs. 320.99Mn.

Monday, 11 March 2013

Quote for the day

"The individual investor should act consistently as an investor and not as a speculator. This means.. that he should be able to justify every purchase he makes and each price he pays by impersonal, objective reasoning that satisfies him that he is getting more than his money's worth for his purchase." - Benjamin Graham

LSL Market Review 11th Mar 2013

Market opened on a positive note but the main index dropped after mid-day on retail selling. It’s assumed as a result of retail investors taking a cue from recent upward pressure on interest rates. News of Cargills/CT Holdings securing IFC backing for their bank failed to show a marked gain on their prices.


ASI dropped 14.08 points (0.25%) to close at 5,677.31 and the S&P SL20 index gained 6.45 points (0.20%) to close at 3,229.19. Turnover was Rs. 557.0Mn.

Top contributors to turnover were John Keells Holdings with Rs. 135.2Mn, Commercial Bank with Rs. 102.8Mn and Kuruwita Textile with Rs. 47.4Mn. Most active counters for the day were PC House, Nation Lanka Finance and Central Investments & Finance.

Notable gainers for the day were Ceylinco Insurance non-voting up by 5.5% to close at Rs. 327.00, Browns up by 4.4% to close at Rs. 116.00 and Namunukula plantations up by 4.1% to close at Rs. 77.00. Notable losers for the day were Orient Garments down by 7.6% to close at Rs. 8.50, Kotagala Plantations down by 7.2% to close at Rs. 50.00 and Central Investments & Finance down by 6.5% to close at Rs. 2.90.

Cash map for today was 57.58%. Foreign participation was 27.11% of total market turnover whilst net foreign buying was Rs. 45.01Mn.
.

The three pitfalls of value investing


By Phil Oakley

Value investing – buying stocks when they're under priced by the market – is one of the few investment strategies that consistently works over the long run. But it's not a painting-by-numbers exercise. You can't just input data into a stock-screening tool and blindly buy the results. The risk is that you end up buying stocks that are cheap for a good reason. Here are some of the pitfalls of three classic value strategies – and how to avoid them.

Low price/earnings (p/e) ratios
The price/earnings (p/e) ratio of a stock is very simple to compute – just divide the share price by earnings per share (EPS). The lower it is, the cheaper the stock. But just buying a stock with a low p/e is no guarantee of success. A low p/e could be the result of various problems, such as:


Low growth prospects: the price of a stock is a function of its future profitability. Companies in declining industries with falling profits should trade on low p/es.

Fiddled figures: the denominator of the p/e ratio – EPS – is based on accounting earnings. Although a company has to meet with accounting standards when stating its profits, there is much scope for manipulation. Companies with aggressive accounting policies are probably best avoided and should trade on low p/es.

Peaking earnings: a cyclical company – such as a house builder – may have a low p/e because its profits have peaked and are set to fall as the business cycle turns. Although it is time-consuming, it is better for investors to compute p/es for cyclical companies using an average of five or ten years' earnings and compare this ratio over time.

Low tax charges: be wary of companies with low p/es and low tax charges. If the low tax charge is temporary and begins to rise, profits can fall and the p/e rise. Where possible, compute the p/e on the basis of fully taxed EPS.

Debt: consider two companies, A and B. Each has £100m of assets, trading profit of £10m and identical growth prospects. A has no debt (£100m equity), but B finances its assets with £50m of debt and £50m of equity. Assuming tax rates of 25%, interest costs of 6% and both market caps equally stated equity. A has a p/e of 13.3 (£100m/£7.5m) and B's is 9.5 (£50m/£5.25m). But can B really be cheaper than A? This is where the enterprise p/e ratio comes in handy. Unlike a normal p/e, this factors in company debt levels. By taking the enterprise values (debt + equity) of A and B and dividing by the after-tax (but pre-debt) operating profits, we can see that the p/es are the same at 13.3 (£100m/£7.5m), which makes sense.

High dividend yields:
Dividends represent tangible returns that are independent of the stockmarket. Buying shares with a high dividend yield can be a good investment strategy (especially if dividends are reinvested), but you should also look at the following:

High payout ratio/low dividend cover: a high yield may result from a company paying out most of its profits in dividends, resulting in a low level of dividend cover (net profits divided by dividend payments). This suggests the dividend could be unsustainable if business conditions deteriorate. Also, if a firm is paying out most of its profits, it means they're not being reinvested to grow the business. As a rule, you want shares with dividend cover of two times or more.

Look for growth potential: without dividend growth, the returns from a high-dividend yield strategy are unlikely to be stellar.

Buy stocks with a high free cash-flow yield: From an accounting perspective, dividends are paid from profits, but in reality they require sufficient surplus cash flow. Free cash flow represents the cash left over for dividends after non-discretionary spending, such as interest, tax and capital expenditure. Buying stocks with a high free cash-flow yield as well as a high dividend yield may prove to be a conservative and fruitful strategy. Free cash dividend cover of 1.5 to 2 times is desirable (see Tim Bennett's video tutorial for more on EPS and free cash-flow yield.

Low price-to-book (p/b) value
This strategy involves buying a company for less than its accounting book value (or shareholders' equity) and was used to great success by value investors such as Benjamin Graham. Key points to remember here are:

Book value is an accounting measure: it may or may not be a relevant indicator of commercial value. To be a successful practitioner of low price to book (p/b) value investing you need to be able to assess the liquidation value of assets on the balance sheet, ie. how much money would be raised if all the companies' assets were sold tomorrow. This may be easy if most of the assets are cash, but stocks, debtors and fixed assets can be harder to value. Many company book values have large proportions of intangible assets that are difficult to value.

Poor businesses aren't worth book value: asset values are a function of the cash flows they produce. Investors can check the reality of balance sheet asset values by calculating a company's return on capital employed (ROCE). As a rough rule of thumb, a company with a ROCE consistently below 10% may have assets that are impaired and need writing down to more realistic values.

Focus on earnings power values (EPVs) instead: this is where you calculate the sustainable profits of a business and value it as a perpetual cash flow. For example, if a business has sustainable profits of £100m and you require a return of 10%, it is worth £1bn (£100m/10%). If you can buy the business at a significant discount to this value, you may have a good value investment.

Source:http://www.moneyweek.com/investment-advice/how-to-invest/strategies/the-pitfalls-of-value-investing-53516

Sunday, 10 March 2013

Quote for the day

"Human emotion is a big enemy of the average investor and trader. Be patient and unemotional. There are periods where traders don't need to trade." - James P. Arthur Huprich 

Learn to Invest Time!


When I think of creating wealth, the first thing that comes to my mind is that I need to invest money. I need apply what I have learned from the Rich Dad series by Robert Kiyosaki by making my money work harder. All along, it never crosses my mind that I need to invest another essential thing to make it happen. In fact, I have been consciously investing this essential thing all along except that I do not realize it.

When I first heard about it yesterday, I feel enlightened. To be rich, I need to invest time too! I need to invest my time to study so as to gain financial literacy. I need invest my time to learn how to invest. I need invest my time to analyze investment opportunities. I need to invest my time to make the actual investments. I need to invest my time to monitor my investments. Time is definitely an essential component for wealth creation.

In short, I definitely need to spend a lot of time to create my wealth as well. That is where my problem comes. I want to be rich but I cannot find time to do it! Does this excuse sound familiar to you?

Unfortunately, according to Rich Dad's series by Robert Kiyosaki, time is one of the two available components that I can invest to create wealth. In other words, if I want to become rich, I must definitely find a way to overcome this excuse.

And this excuse is used for a lot of other things too. For examples, I want to exercise regularly so that I can become healthy. But I cannot find time to do it. I want to practice regularly so that I can become a good dancer. But I cannot find time to do it. I want to spend more time with my loved ones but I cannot find time to do it.

Why do I say that it is an excuse and not a limitation? Well, I have 24 hours a day like everyone else. No one is privilege to have more time compared to the other. Since the amount of time is the same for everyone, why is it that someone seems to have more time and accomplish more things than others?

The answer is very simple. It is a matter of personal choice on how I spend my time. Usually, I choose to spend my time on something that I feel is more important. That is why I will never have time for the unimportant things. Since it is a matter of choice, then it is an excuse when I say I do not have time. It simply means that I do not find the matter important enough to invest my time on it.

Imagine if 24 hours a day is like a note of $24, how will I spend the $24? I can spend $24 to buy a dozen of can drinks such as Coke from the supermarket. Alternatively, I can spend $24 to drink a few can drinks from a high-class restaurant or pub. Comparatively, I will have gained more if I have spent my $24 on the supermarket.

That is exactly the same situation with time. How much can I accomplish in 24 hours is really dependent on how I have spent it. If I have spent it wisely, I can accomplish more things. If I just laze around and do nothing, then I will accomplish nothing.

For any typical working person, he needs to spend about 8 hours per day on sleep. He spends about 4 hours daily on meals and personal items. Another 10 hours per day of his time is spent on work including travelling time. All that is left at the end of the day is about 2 hours. If he just relaxes and watches the television, then his whole day is basically gone. But if he spends the 2 hours wisely, he will be able to accomplish more things. Similarly, the way he spends his weekends will determine how much he can accomplish in life.

Some people may be luckier than others because they have more leisure time than the others. But that does not necessary mean that they will be able to accomplish more things than others. The key is how they invest their leisure time. Just like a person who earns more than others does not invest wisely as learned from the Rich Dad's series by Robert Kiyosaki, he will be definitely poorer than others by spending mindlessly.

In conclusion, I feel that learning to invest time is as important as learning to invest money if I want to succeed in life.


Source: Rich dad Secrets 4 Me

Friday, 8 March 2013

Quote for the day


"Remember, I am neither a bear nor a bull, I am an agnostic opportunist. I want to make money short- and long-term. I want to find good situations and exploit them." - Jim Cramer