Sunday, 10 May 2020

How to Calculate Total Stock Returns

By Matthew Frankel, CFP

Total returns can help compare the performance of investments that pay different dividend yields and were held for different lengths of time.

Many investors focus their attention on how a stock's price changes over time. However, when you're talking about dividend-paying stocks, that doesn't even begin to tell the entire story. For example, if I tell you that Verizon was trading for roughly $54 per share three years ago, and today it's trading around $61 per share, it may sound like investors who bought the stock made $7 per share over the three-year period.

However, if I then tell you that over the past three years, Verizon also paid its shareholders a total of $7 per share in dividends, that changes the story a little. Instead of the $7 capital gain per share, which translates to about 13%, investors actually made twice that much when taking dividends paid into account.

Total return takes both capital gains and dividends into account, in order to provide a complete picture of how a stock performed over a specified time period. This can be extremely useful for evaluating investment returns among dividend-paying stocks, and for comparing the performance of dividend-paying stocks to those without any dividends or other distributions. It can also help compare investment results when stocks were held for different lengths of time.

What are total returns?

Simply put, an investment's total return is its overall return from all sources, such as capital gains, dividends, and other distributions to shareholders. As a basic example, a stock that paid a 5% dividend yield relative to its purchase price, and which also increased in value by 5% over the first year you owned it, would have produced a total return of 10% over the one-year time period.

Total returns can be calculated as a dollar amount, or as a percentage. In other words, you can say that a stock's total return was $8 per share over a certain one-year period, or you could say that its total return was 11%. The best way to express total return depends on the context you're using it for, as we'll see throughout the rest of this discussion.

Total return can also be expressed on an overall basis, or over specified time intervals. If you held a stock for several years, it might be useful to know its overall total return during your holding period. Alternatively, knowing your total return on an annualized basis could help compare the results of that investment with others you own, or with the stock market as a whole.

We'll get into the actual calculation methods and some examples in later sections.

Why is total return important?

Total return allows you to see the big picture of how well (or poorly) an investment is actually doing -- not just how its share price is performing. Many stock investments in particular are designed to produce a combination of income and capital gains, so total return combines these two types of investment returns into a single metric.

Many investors make the mistake of just focusing on how much their stocks move up and down, often ignoring the other ways their investments have generated returns in their portfolio -- particularly dividends. Similarly, many income-focused investors often judge their investments primarily on the dividends they pay, and don't pay enough attention to share-price movements. Total return can be highly useful when assessing the performance of your investments, and comparing their performance to each other, or to the overall stock market.

Important terms investors should know

In order to truly understand total returns and how to use them effectively, there are a few other investment terms and concepts you should know as well. Plus, knowing these will help make you a more well-rounded investor. Just to name a few:

Annualized return

Investment return expressed on a yearly basis. For instance, if you have one investment that produced a 20% total return in three years and another that produced a 35% total return in five years, it can be difficult at first glance to determine which was the better investment. We'll get into the calculation of annualized total returns later, but the point is that it can be a more apples-to-apples comparison to see investment returns expressed on an annualized, or yearly, basis, especially if they were held for different time periods.
Simple returns

There are two ways to express investment returns over time -- simple and compound. A simple return (or simple interest) is a rate of return that is based on the principal, or original investment amount, year after year. This is often used in the context of fixed-income (bond) investments. For example, if a bond costs $1,000 and yields 5%, that is a form of simple return -- in other words, 5% of the original cost, or $50, will be paid to the bondholder every year until maturity.

Compound returns

A compound return (or compound interest) means a return that is paid on the principal and any accumulated returns that have already been paid. Annualized total return is a form of a compound return. As a simplified example to illustrate compound returns, consider an investment that generates a 10% annualized total return. If you invest $1,000, you can expect to have $1,100 by the end of the first year. For the second year, however, the 10% would be added to the $1,100, not to the original $1,000. So, you'd end up with $1,210 at the end of the second year.
Compounding frequency

The most often-used method of calculating total returns is with annual compounding, and that's what the formula I'm about to discuss in the next section will do. However, other compounding intervals are possible when computing returns and interest charges in finance. For example, your bank probably compounds your interest daily or monthly on your savings account, and other intervals like quarterly, weekly, or semiannual compounding are also possible. Just to give you an idea of how this works, a $1,000 investment that generates 10% total returns compounded on a semiannual basis would be worth $1,050 after six months. After another six months, a 5% (half of the annual return) gain would be added, which would make it $1,102.50.

Dividend reinvestment/DRIP

To maximize the total returns of a long-term investment, dividend reinvestment is an essential step. This means that when your stocks pay you dividends, you use those dividend payments to buy additional shares of the same stock. With most brokers, you can enroll your stocks in a dividend reinvestment plan, or DRIP, that will do this automatically and without any additional trading commissions. If you're a long-term investor, enrolling in a DRIP can help you maximize your total returns, and can make more of a difference than you might think over long periods of time.

Internal rate of return (IRR)

Internal rate of return, or IRR, is similar in concept to total return, but it involves a more complicated calculation. Aside from its complexity, the biggest difference between IRR and total return is that IRR is a forward-looking metric, incorporating things like projected dividends or distributions, future profitability, and more. This is more commonly used when talking about real estate investments, but it can be applied to stocks as well when trying to project long-term returns from different prospective investments.
Expected total return

Expected total return is the same calculation as total return but using future assumptions instead of actual investment results. For example, if you predict that a stock trading for $30 will rise to $33 over the next year while paying $2 in dividends, your expected total return is $5 per share or 16.7%. Obviously, nobody has a crystal ball that can predict stock performance and an investment's past performance doesn't guarantee its future results. That said, projections can still be a valuable tool when analyzing opportunities, so using the information you have to calculate expected total return can help you get an idea of the future potential of certain investment opportunities.

Risk-adjusted return

This uses the risk-free rate of return and investment volatility in order to take an investment's risk level into account when calculating returns. A basic investment goal is to maximize the amount of return produced by investments relative to the total risk. In other words, a lower return by a low-risk investment can be a better risk-adjusted return than a superior return produced by a higher-risk investment. One popular way to assess risk-adjusted returns is with a metric called the Sharpe ratio, a not-too-complicated metric that subtracts the risk-free rate of return from an investment's actual return, and then divides by the standard deviation (volatility) of that return.

Unrealized vs. realized capital gains

An unrealized capital gain refers to a stock or other investment that has gone up in value since you bought it, but that you still own. In other words, if you paid $5,000 for a stock investment and it is now worth $6,000, you can't spend that $1,000 of profit until you sell. Once you sell an appreciated investment, it is then referred to as a realized capital gain. This is an important concept in the context of total returns.

How to calculate total return for a stock investment

Now we'll go through the process of calculating total returns. There are a few different ways to calculate total return, depending on the exact form of the metric you're looking for, but the good news is that none of them are particularly complex.

To determine an investment's overall total return, follow these steps:

First, you need to determine how much capital gains it has produced since you bought it. For instance, if you paid $50 for a stock and it's now trading for $60, your capital gain is $10 per share.

Then, you need to add up the dividends and other distributions the investment has paid over your entire holding period. Adding this figure to your capital gains will tell you the investment's total return, as a dollar amount.
Third, to express total return as a percentage, which is generally more useful, simply take the dollar amount of total return you calculated, divide by the price you paid for the investment, and multiply the result by 100.
Finally, to annualize the total return, you'll need a bit more complicated math. Take the percentage total return you found in the previous step (written as a decimal) and add 1. Then, raise this to the power of 1 divided by the number of years you held the investment. Finally, subtract 1. In mathematical form, this looks like:
This formula assumes annual compounding, which keeps the calculation as uncomplicated as possible. There are other ways to do it, such as continuous or monthly compounding, but for the purposes of calculating and comparing investment returns, this method is generally sufficient.

A real-world example

That last part may sound a bit confusing, especially when it comes to calculating annualized total returns, so let's take a look at a step-by-step real-world example.

Let's say that you bought shares of Bank of America stock on Jan. 2, 2017, and sold them on Jan. 2, 2019, and you want to determine your total return on your investment.

Before we start, here's the information you need to know:
You bought shares for $22.60.
Two years later, you sold those shares for $25.50.
Over the two-year holding period, Bank of America paid eight quarterly dividends, which added up to $0.92.

Now let's go through the three total return calculations I discussed in the last section.

First, your overall total return. Your capital gain on each share was $25.50 minus $22.60, or $2.90 per share. Adding the $0.92 in dividends you received shows a total return of $3.82 per share on your investment.

Second, to convert this total return to a percentage, you need to divide the $3.82 total return by the purchase price for each share, or $22.60, and then multiply by 100. This gives you a total return of 16.9% over two years.

Finally, if you want to know what your annualized total return was, you need to use the formula from the last section. When you do that, here's how the calculation should look, in percentage form:

Total return with reinvested dividends

Now, it's worth mentioning that if you're reinvesting your dividends as you go -- which I absolutely recommend long-term investors do -- the calculation gets a bit more complicated. Essentially, each of the reinvestments becomes its own return calculation, including the capital gains generated from the newly purchased shares.

It's difficult to calculate total returns with reinvested dividends using the previously discussed method. After all, you'll buy new shares at whatever price they're trading for as of the dividend payment date, and you'll end up with more shares than you started with, and then those shares will begin to pay you dividends as well. So what's the solution?

The total return calculation with reinvested dividends can be simplified by looking at the investment on an overall value (as opposed to a per-share) basis.

Consider our Bank of America example from the previous section. Let's say that you invested $10,000 in the stock, and that after two years of reinvesting your dividends, your investment is now worth $11,750 -- a 17.5% total return (or 0.175 in decimal form).

Using our formula for annualized total return, we see that your total return with reinvested dividends is:

So by reinvesting your dividends, you achieved a slightly better total return than you would have by simply collecting the dividends paid by the stock.

How to use total return calculations in your investment strategy

There are a few practical uses for the concept of total return. As I've mentioned, total return is a good way to compare the performance of various investments over time. For example, let's say that you own five stocks in your portfolio, and that you've invested $1,000 in each one. Some don't pay dividends at all, and those that do pay varying amounts.

At first glance, it can be difficult to determine which of these stocks was the best performer over any multiyear period, especially if you don't automatically reinvest your dividends and just receive the payments in cash in your brokerage account. This is where total return comes in -- it can give you a single number that sums up the performance of each investment.

From a strategy perspective, it can be useful to evaluate expected total returns from your investments when making decisions. As a personal example, I'm a big fan of real estate investment trusts, or REITs, which are specifically designed to be total return investments with a nice combination of income and capital gain. By assessing one of these stock's track record of total returns, and seeing whether the company's business composition has changed, I can compare total return potential when screening prospective investments.

The bottom line on total return

Total return is a great metric to add to your investment knowledge. Some investments are designed to produce a great deal of capital appreciation, while others are intended to produce income. Total return combines these two types of investment performance into a single metric.

Knowing how to calculate and apply total return can help you evaluate the overall performance of different stocks, compare different potential investments, and understand the value of dividend reinvestment, just to name a few things.
Source: www.fool.com

Quote for the day

"To walk safely through the maze of human life, one needs the light of wisdom and the guidance of virtue." - Gautama Buddha

Nicolas Darvas And His Amazing "Box Theory"

The techno-fundamentalist who made millions.

You may or may not have heard of Nicolas Darvas, the legendary dancer-turned-investor who made two million dollars in the stock market in the days when that was a whole lot of money -- and wrote a book on how he did it. In this article I'll go through who he was, how he bought and sold his shares, and how his ultimately successful strategy was based on a "box theory" of how share prices move. I'll also offer a concrete example of his box theory in action, via an example chart that presented itself to me recently.

Darvas, the dancer
Nicolas Darvas emigrated to America in 1951 and trained with his half-sister to become a ballroom dancer. Although they became a highly successful worldwide touring act, this doesn't sound like the ideal background for an equally highly successful investing career. So maybe I should mention that, before emigrating to America, Darvas had studied economics at the University of Budapest.

Darvas, the gambler
Having been offered shares of a particular stock in lieu of payment by a couple of nightclub owners, and having then made a tidy profit on the stock, Darvas got the stock market bug and started asking around for more "stock tips". By his own admission, he was merely gambling, and his shrinking portfolio reflected that fact.


Darvas, the fundamentalist
Darvas signed up with a broker in New York and began regarding the brokers' suggestions as merely "information" rather than "tips", and he began taking a fundamentalist approach to assessing stocks based on factors such as the price-to-earnings ratio. Yet he still lost money, and faced bankruptcy.

Darvas, the technician
Darvas saved his own skin by investing in a stock -- TEXAS GULF PRODUCING -- for which he knew nothing about the fundamentals. All he knew was that its price was rising day after day. This marked the beginning of his time as a technical investor, focused on buying the right stocks at the right time with a view to making small losses and big profits. His chief weapons in this endeavour would be price and volume, the box theory (illustrated later), implemented using automatic buy orders and stop-loss sell orders.

Darvas, the techno-fundamentalist
Having noticed that most stocks go up in a bull market (but some more than others) and that most stocks go down in a bear market (but some less than others), Darvas concluded that what distinguished the good stocks and the bad stocks was their earnings. Thus, he settled on a techo-fundamentalist approach in which he would select stocks on their technical (price) action in the market, but only if he could give "improving earning power" as a fundamental reason for investing.

Saturday, 9 May 2020

Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis

By Madhuri Thakur

Ohhh, the Great War of the Ages! Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis. Which one is better? Which one to go for? There can be different routes for different people.

Do you believe in reading charts and looking at trends? If yes, then you have a mindset based on Technical analysis. Or do you believe in making investment decisions based on Financials, Growth and EPS? Well, then you have a mindset based on fundamental analysis!

No doubt, that some may find both types of analysis useful for examining market action. It’s just that they both have a different School of thought. Your trading style and attitude will determine the kind of analysis beneficial for you. I have seen many investors combining both these analysis. While others concentrate only on one aspect and ignore the other.

Just to give you some examples:

Martin Schwartz, a successful wall street trader, gained reputation and wealth due to Technical Analysis. Whereas, Jim Rogers, a popular investor owes his success to fundamental analysis. Both of them may disagree on many concepts.But they will surely agree that emotional control is the most important path to follow.

So let’s discuss these two types of analysis to help you find out which suits you better: 


Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis?

What is Fundamental Analysis?

Fundamental analysis aims to find the value of the company. This means arriving at its Intrinsic price. This kind of analysis uses Economic factors. These factors prove as the fundamental elements to determine the price. So if you are opting for the Fundamental route, be sure to perform the following analysis:

  • Industry Analysis
  • Company Analysis
  • Economic Analysis
Major Assumptions of Fundamental Analysis:
# 1 In the long run Stock Price corrects itself.
# 2 You can make gains by purchasing an under-valued stock and then wait for the market to correct itself.
This investing technique is adopted by buy, hold and value investors.

What is Technical Analysis?

It is also a method of evaluating Securities. But the entire game here is dependent upon the statistics generated by the market. Charts and patterns are the Bread and Butter of technical analysis.

So let’s see what are the characteristics of technical analysis:

  • This analysis uses past price movements to predict its future price movements.
  • Trends and Patterns play a major role, rather than the Intrinsic Value.
  • Market Price is everything. Factors affecting it are not considered, like in fundamental analysis. 
The Three Golden Rules:

Technical Analysts adhere to these three Golden Rules:

  • First Rule: Prices discount all information available to the public.
  • Second Rule: Price movements are not random. Trends behind the price action can be established by using Technical tools.
  • Third Rule: Price Trends are likely to repeat themselves.

How to carry out Fundamental Analysis?


Step 1: Perform Industry Analysis



Dig and find out everything about the industry/sector in which the firm operates.

This type of analysis will give you insights about:

  • Sector growth
  • Contribution to GDP
  • Trends in that sector
  • Demand and Supply analysis
Step 2: Perform Company Analysis


  • Understand the inside out operations of the Company. Carry out Horizontal and Vertical Analysis.
  • Evaluate Trends over time. Compute the percentage increase or decrease relative to base year.
  • Understand where the company has applied its resources. Know the proportions in which they are distributed among various accounts (balance sheet and income statement).
  • Next tool that you must adopt is Ratio Analysis. This will help you understand the changes in the company’s Financial Situation.
  • Note that, Ratios are parameters and not absolute measurements. Hence must be interpreted cautiously.

Step 3: Perform Financial Modeling



  • Forecast the future Financial of the Company (financial modeling) for next five to seven years.
  • You may require lot of information and assumptions here.
  • The ultimate goal is to understand how the Financial statements and stock price will look in the future.
Step 4: Carry out Valuation Analysis

Many Valuation techniques are company/industry dependent. Discounted Cash Flow and Relative Valuation approaches are used in most cases. Although you may require other types of approaches based on company type.


Discounted Cash Flow Analysis:


In Discounted Cash flow analysis, you arrive at an Intrinsic price. The methods and procedure used for the same are interesting. We are not going to discuss the same in detail in this article. But let’s just jump to the step where you arrive at your intrinsic Share Price for the company. So here is how you will interpret your results.


  • If Market Price > Intrinsic Share Price = Stock is Overvalued, Hence the Recommendation here is Sell the Stock.
  • If Market Price < Intrinsic Share Price = Stock is Undervalued, Recommendation here will be Buy the Stock.
Relative Valuation Analysis:


This valuation technique makes use of comparable Company Analysis. Here you value you company of interest by comparing it to its peer Group.

Some of the Valuation parameters used in this are:

  • PE ratio
  • EPS
  • EV/EBITDA
  • EV/Sales etc.
How to carry out Technical Analysis?

Step 1: Identify which Securities interest you!


A small research on which sector is currently trending will help you decide what to buy or sell. This is the first and the major step that you will take.

Step 2: Identify the best suited Strategy.


Not all the stocks will fit into the same strategy. Identifying the best strategy for the selected stocks is important.

Step 3: Select a Trading Account

You need a right trading account with the required support, functionality and cost.

Step 4: Know your Tools & Interfaces

Select those tools that fit your trading requirements and strategies. There are lot of free tools available.As a novice trader you can try them first to know their features.

Step 5: Always Paper Trade first!

It’s a big world out there. To jump into the Trading Jungle without any prior knowledge is a big mistake. I would suggest you to atleast spend a month, testing your system with end of day market data. Select few stocks that meet your technical indicators requirements. See how they are doing each day.

Step 6: Set Stop Loss

Holding a losing Trade will dig a deeper hole for you. Set a Stop loss no matter what Stock you choose.
Source: Investopedia

Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis Advantages & Disadvantages:


Fundamental Analysis:

Advantages:


1. Use of Analytical methods:
The methods and approaches used in Fundamental analysis are based on sound Financial data. This eliminates the room for personal bias.


2. 360 Degree Focus: Fundamental analysis also considers long term economic, demographic, technologic and consumer trends.

3. Systematic approach for deducing the Value: The statistical and analytical tools used,help in arriving at a proper Buy/Sell recommendation.

4. Better Understanding:
Rigorous accounting and financial analysis, helps to gauge better understanding of everything.

Disadvantages:


1. Time consuming: Carrying out Industry analysis, financial modeling and valuation, is not a cup of tea. It can get complicated and may need lot of hard work to start with.

2. Assumptions centric: Assumptions play a vital role in forecasting the financials. So it is important to consider the best and the worst case scenario. Unexpected negative economic, political or legislative changes, may cause problems.

Technical Analysis:


Advantages:

1. Gives insights on Volume Trend: Demand & Supply governs the trading market. Thusit tells you a lot about Traders Sentiments. You can actually judge how the overall market is working. Usually High demand push up the prices, and high supply push down the prices.


2. Tells you when to Enter and Exit: Technical analysis is able to tell you when to enter or exit from the GAME.

3. Provides Current Information: Price reflects all the known information about an asset. Prices may increase or decrease, but ultimately the current price is the balancing point for all information.

4. Patterns give you direction: You can use patterns as a guide to direct your buy and sell decisions.

Disadvantages:
1. Too many Indicators spoil the Charts: Too many indicators can produce confusing signals which may affect your analysis.

2. Underlying Fundamentals ignored:
Technical analysis does not take into account the underlying fundamentals of a company. This can prove risky in case of long time frames.
Source: http://www.investors.asn.au/

Snapshot of Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis

Source: http://www.diffen.com/

Conclusion

Try to ask some Investor: “Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis”? 

Most of them will probably tell you that combination of both analysis is the best way to go. While most analysts on Wall Street focus on the fundamental side, major brokerage firms now employ technical analysis as well.

Whether you opt for Fundamental or technical analysis, always remember these two quotes of Warren Buffet. I truly believe they have got a very strong meaning.

"Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful."

"The market is there to serve you and not to instruct you.”


So ask yourself these questions,

Do I focus more on technicals or fundamentals? Or Should I try researching both of them?
Source: www.wallstreetmojo.com/

Quote for the day

"Health is the greatest gift, contentment the greatest wealth, faithfulness the best relationship." - Gautama Buddha

Friday, 8 May 2020

Quote for the day

"To be idle is a short road to death and to be diligent is a way of life; foolish people are idle, wise people are diligent." - Gautama Buddha

Financial Ratios and Bankruptcy Predictions

Financial Ratios
There are many financial ratios that can be calculated. Some are more useful than others. You should determine which ratios are the most important in your industry. 


Listed here are thirteen ratios that are most often used by financial analysts. 
Solvency Ratios: Quick Ratio, Current Ratio, Current Liabilities to Net Worth, Total Liabilities to Net Worth; Fixed Assets to Net Worth; Efficiency Ratios: Collection Period, Inventory Turnover, Assets to Sales, Sales to Net Working Capital, Accounts Payable to Sales; Profitability Ratios: Return on Sales, Return on Assets, Return on Equity.

The following is a more complete list of Ratios and synopsis of the information they provide. Commonly applied ratios used in financial analysis are defined below in seven groups for convenience. These groupings should not restrict their usage.

A. Solvency Ratios: Solvency, or liquidity, ratios are used to measure the financial soundness of a business and how well it can satisfy its obligations. They are designed to help measure the degree of financial risk that a business faces. "Financial risk," in this context, means the extent to which the business has debt obligations that must be met, regardless of the cash flow. These ratios are of particular interest to short term creditors.

1. Absolute Liquidity Ratio
This ratio shows how much of a firm’s current liabilities can be covered by its most liquid assets, cash and marketable securities. The liquidity ratio measures the extent to which a company or other entity can quickly liquidate assets and cover short-term liabilities, and therefore is of interest to short-term creditors. Also called cash asset ratio or cash ratio. Current liabilities are payable within one year.

Absolute Liquidity Ratio = (Cash + Marketable Securities) / Current Liabilities

2. Acid Test Ratio
The Acid Test, or Quick, Ratio differs from the Absolute Liquidity Ratio to the extent that net Accounts Receivable is considered. It is another way to determine whether a company can make their day-to-day payments.

Acid Test Ratio = Quick Ratio = (Cash + Marketable Securities + Accounts Receivable (net)) / Current Liabilities

3. Current Ratio
This is also called the working capital ratio. Current or trading assets include items that can be converted to cash within one year of normal operations. They include cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, as considered in the acid test ratio, while adding the value of inventory. Although short term creditors may feel more comfortable when the debtor firm has a high current ratio in comparison to its competitors, too high of a current ratio may signify inefficiency, since too much may be tied up in non productive assets. Generally, any value of less than 1 to 1 suggests an over-reliance on inventory or other current assets to pay off short-term debt. Higher ratios indicate a better buffer between current obligations and a firm's ability to pay them. The quality of current assets is a critical factor in interpreting this analysis.

Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities

4. Accounts Payable to Sales Ratio
This ratio measures how a firm pays its creditors in relation to its sales volume - the speed with which a company pays vendors relative to sales. A low percentage is usually considered healthy. Numbers higher than typical industry ratios suggest that the company is using suppliers to float operations.

Accounts Payable to Sales Ratio = Accounts Payable / Net Sales

5. Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio
This ratio measures a firm's efficiency in freeing up working capital by providing the rate at which working capital tied up in receivables is converted to cash. The higher the turnover, or number of times in a given period that receivables are turned into cash, the more liquid are the firm's receivables. For industry wide comparison, Net Sales is often used. Some prefer to use Total Credit Sales. Net Sales is the total of the invoices billed during a given period, less any discounts and returns. Average Accounts Receivable is the average of the beginning and ending balances for a given period.

Receivables Turnover = Total Credit Sales / Average Receivables Owing

6. Assets to Sales Ratio
This ratio measures the percentage of investment in assets that is required to generate the current annual sales level. A high percentage may indicate that the firm is not being aggressive enough in its marketing effort, or it is not fully employing its assets. A low percentage may indicate that the firm is selling more than can be safely covered by its as sets.

Assets to Sales Ratio = Total Assets/ Net Sales

7. Average Collection Period
This ratio provides the average period required to collect receivables. It provides an indication of the quality of a firm’s receivables and serves as a measure of the efficiency of its credit department in granting credit and collecting payment. The ratio may be compared to both the firm's credit terms and the industry average to measure effectiveness. If credit transactions vary, such as a retailer selling both on open credit and instalment, this ratio should be calculated for each category. Discounted notes, which create contingent liabilities, must be added back into receivables.

Average Collection Period = 365 (Accounts + Notes Receivable) / Annual Net Credit Sales


8. Collection Index
The collection index provides insight similar to that of the average collection period.

Collection Index = Collections Made During Period / Accounts Receivable Owing at Start of Period

9. Past Due Index
This index can be useful in trend analysis to indicate whether there is improvement or deterioration in collection policies and procedures.

Past Due Index = Total Amount Past Due / Total Sum Uncollected

10. Bad Debt Loss Index
This index may be calculated on either credit sales or total net sales. An increase in this index is not necessarily bad, if a more relaxed credit policy results in more sales and profit than losses.

Bad Debt Loss Index (BDLI) = Bad Debt Losses / Total Credit Sales

11. Basic Defence Interval
This provides the period of time a firm can cover its cash expenses without additional financing should all revenues cease.

Basic Defence Interval (SDI) = 365 (Cash + Receivables + Marketable Securities) / (Operating Expenses + Interest + Income Taxes)

12. Inventory Turnover Ratio
This ratio provides an indication of the liquidity of inventories. A low ratio may indicate that too much cash has been invested in inventory.

Inventory Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory

13. Net Sales to Inventory Ratio
An annual increase in this ratio is often considered healthy, while a decline may indicate problems. A low ratio may indicate obsolete inventory, over commitment of investment in inventory, poor purchasing policies, or contingency stockpiling.

Sales to Inventory Ratio = Net Sales / Inventory

B. Working Capital Ratios:
Gross working capital describes current assets, while net working capital is current assets minus current liabilities. Inadequate working capital can be corrected by lowering sales or increasing assets by retaining earnings or selling stock.

1. Cash Available to Finance Operations Ratio
This ratio roughly indicates whether there is sufficient cash to finance current operations. It is similar to the basic defence ratio, except the depreciation is omitted from the denominator, since it is not a cash drain.

Cash Available to Finance Operations Ratio = 365 (Cash + Receivables + Marketable Securities) / (Operating Expenses - Depreciation +Interest +Income Taxes)

2. Current Asset Turnover Ratio
This ratio is useful in identifying trends in the turnover and profitability of current assets. The ratio is slightly less accurate, if depreciation is included.

Current Asset Turnover Ratio = (Cost of Good~ Sold + Expenses + Interest + Taxes - Depreciation) / Average Current Assets

3. Current Liabilities to Net Worth Ratio
This ratio measures the proportion of funds current creditors contribute to operations, or the amounts due creditors within a year as a percentage of the shareholders’ investment. An increasing ratio indicates decreasing security for creditors.

Current Liabilities to Net Worth Ratio = Current Liabilities / Tangible Net Worth

4. Current Liabilities to Inventory Ratio
This measures the extent to which a firm relies on sales to generate funds to pay current liabilities.

Current Debt-to-Inventory = Current Liabilities / Inventory

5. Working Capital Ratio 
This is another name for the current ratio, a liquidity ratio. If the ratio is less than one then there is negative working capital. A high working capital ratio is not always a good thing, it could indicate that there is too much inventory or there is not enough investment of excess cash.

Working Capital Ratio= Current Assets / Current Liabilities 

6. Long Term Liabilities to Working Capital Ratio
Normally this ratio should not exceed 100%

Long Term Liabilities to working Capital Ratio = Long Term Debt / Net Working Capital

7. Inventory to Net Working Capital Ratio
Overstocking can lead to bankruptcy. Normally this ratio should not exceed 80%, but should be compared with the industry average. This ratio is often used in conjunction with the inventory turnover ratio.

Inventory to Net Working Capital = Inventory / Net Working Capital

8. Working Capital Turnover Ratio
This ratio indicates whether a firm is over invested in fixed, or slow, assets. It should be compared with the industry average. It complements the sales to net working capital ratio.

Working Capital Turnover = Net Sales / Net Working Capital

9. Sales to Net Working Capital Ratio
This measures the number of times working capital is turned over annually in relation to net sales. A high turnover rate may indicate excessive sales volume in relation to the investment in the business, or extensive reliance on credit. This ratio should be used in conjunction with the working capital turnover ratio.

Sales to Net Working Capital Ratio = Sales / Net Working Capital

C. Leverage Ratios:
These ratios indicate proportionate risk to a firm's owners and creditors. Leverage can increase both earning and losses.

1. Debt and Preferred Ratio
This ratio measures the extent of financing contributed by creditors and preferred owners.

Debt and Preferred Ratio= (Long Term Debt + Preferred Funds) / Total Capital Employed

2. Debt Ratio
This ratio measures the percentage of total funds supplied by creditors. Creditors normally prefer a lower ratio, but management may use leverage to produce a higher ratio.

Debt Ratio = (Current + Long Term Debt) / Total Assets

3. Debt to Equity Ratio
This ratio provides the relative positions of creditors and owners.

Debt to Equity Ratio = (Long Term Debt + Preferred) / Common Stockholders' Equity

4. Equity Ratio
This ratio shows the share of the firm's capital provided by equity holders.

Equity Ratio = Common Shareholders' Equity / Total Capital Employed


D. Coverage Ratios: 
These ratios measure the protection offered creditors and a firms ability to attract new shareholders and arrange its debt advantageously.

1. Cash Flow to Liabilities Ratio 
This ratio is used to compare statements with a firm, rather than industry, because of varying depreciation practices. Ideally, liquidity would increase as due dates for debt maturity approach.

Cash Flow to Liabilities Ratio = (Net Income + Depreciation) / Total Liabilities

2. Current Assets to Total Liabilities Ratio
This ratio measures protection for both short and long term liabilities. A ratio in excess of 1OO% indicates that long term creditors may be paid out of working capital if the firm is liquidated.

Current Assets to Total Liabilities Ratio = Current Assets / (Current + Long Term Debt)

3. Dividend Payout Ratio
This ratio is the percentage of earnings received by shareholders during each period.

Payout Ratio = Dividends per Share / Earnings per Share

4. Fixed Assets to Net Worth Ratio
Disproportionate investment in illiquid fixed assets decreases the amount of funds available for daily operations and can leave a firm vulnerable to unexpected hazards and adverse changes in the business climate.

Fixed Assets to Net Worth Ratio = (Fixed Assets (net) - Intangibles) / Tangible Net Worth

5. Shareholder's Equity Ratio
A low ratio of equity to assets may precede difficulty in meeting interest charges and debt obligations.

Equity Ratio = Shareholders' Equity / Total Assets

6. Tangible Net Worth to Total Debt Ratio
This ratio measures the proportion between the shareholders' capital and that contributed by creditors. It is the inverse of the debt ratio.

Tangible Net Worth to Total Debt Ratio = Tangible Net Worth / Total Debt

7. Times Interest Earned Ratio
The margin between income and interest payments is considered a good indication of a firm's ability to meet interest payments.

Times Interest Earned Ratio = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes / Interest Expense

8. Total Liabilities to Net Worth
This ratio relates debt to equity. The higher this ratio, the less protection for creditors. Intangible assets, such as good will or capitalized research and development, should be excluded from net worth.

Total Liabilities to Net Worth Ratio = (Current + Deferred Debt) / Tangible Net Worth


E. Profitability Ratios:
These ratios provide the answer to management's overall effectiveness ranked by returns generated on sales and investments.

Gross profit is the difference between net sales and the cost of goods sold, which is the sum of the expenses required to manufacture, purchase, or service customers.

Net profit after taxes is the basic measure of a firm's operating success. It is gross profit less all expenses directly applicable to the firm’s operations, including income taxes. Any surplus (profit) can be added to retained earnings or distributed to shareholders as dividends. When expenses exceed net sales and a loss occurs, this loss is charged against net worth as a reduction to the equity account.

1. Capital Turn Over Ratio
This ratio indicates whether investment is adequately proportionate to sales and whether a potential credit problem or management problem exists. A high ratio may indicate over trading or under capitalization, while a low ratio may indicate over-capitalization.

Gross Tangible Fixed Assets – Land Ratio = Net Sales / Tangible Net Worth

2. Earnings per Share
It should be noted that all significant aspects of a firm's performance cannot be reduced to a single figure as represented by this highly publicized financial ratio.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) = (Earnings After Taxes - Preferred Dividends) / Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding

3. Earning Power
Earning power is increased by heavier trading on assets, by decreasing cost to lower the break even point, or by increasing sales faster than the accompanying rise in costs. Usually, sales is the key.

Earning Power = Net Sales / Tangible Assets x Earnings After Taxes / Net Sales

4. Gross Profit on Net Sales Ratio
This ratio provides the average mark up, or margin, on goods sold. It can help identify trends in a firm's credit policy, mark-ups, purchasing, and general merchandising. It may vary widely among firms in the same industry, according to sales, location, size, and competition.

Gross Margin Ratio = Gross Margin / Net Sales

Gross Profit Rate = (Net Sales - Cost of Goods Sold) / Net Sales

5. Management Rate of Return
This rate quantifies the efficient use of assets compared with a target rate of return.

Rate of Return = Operating Income / ( Fixed Assets + Net Working Capital)

6. Maintenance and Repairs to Net Sales Ratio
This is an example of an expense ratio by an expenditure category that might be important in a particular industry.

Sum Spent on Repairs per Dollar of Sales = Maintenance and Repair Costs / Net Sales

7. Net Operating Profit Ratio
When there are significant financial charges, this ratio is preferable to the return on assets ratio. Net profit to net worth is influenced by the method of financing.

Net Operating Profit Ratio = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes / Tangible Net Worth

8. Net Profit to Tangible Net Worth
This ratio measures management's ability to realize an adequate return on the capital invested. It is often compared with an industry average.

Net Profit Rate = Earnings After Taxes / Tangible Net Worth

9. Net Profits to Net Working Capital
Working capital provides the cushion to carry inventories and receivables and finance ordinary business operations.

Net Profits to Net Working Capital = Earnings After Taxes / Net Working Capital

10. Operating Expenses Ratio
This ratio shows management's ability to adjust expense items to changing sales. Trend analysis identifies any problem category. The higher this ratio the more sales are being absorbed by expenses. Total operating expenses include cost of goods sold, selling, administrative, and general expenses.

Operating Expenses Ratio = Total Operating Expenses / Net Sales

11. Operating Ratio
This ratio measures the profitability of normal business operations. It excludes other revenue, or loses, extraordinary items, interest on long term debt, and income taxes. It is usually compared with industry averages.

Operating Ratio = Operating Income / Net Sales

12. Price Earnings Ratio
This ratio is used to compare alternate investment opportunities. It may be interpreted as the value placed on a particular firm's earnings.

Price Earnings Ratio = Market Price Per Share of Common Stock / Earnings Per Share

13. Rate of Return on Common Shareholders' Equity
This ratio is based on book value and is used for comparison with similar firms within the same industry.

Rate of Return = (Earnings After Taxes - Preferred Stock Dividends) / (Tangible Net Worth - Par Value of Preferred Stock)

14. Rate of Return on Total Assets
This measures management's ability to earn a return on the firm's assets without regard to variations in the method of financing.

Rate of Return on Total Assets = (Earnings After Taxes + Interest Expense) / Average Total Assets during the Year

15. Return on Sales
This rate is usually compared with the industry average. The higher the rate, the better the firm is able to survive a downturn. If the rate is low, a high turnover of inventory is required to obtain an adequate return on investment. Normally this rate is fairly constant over time.

Net Profit Rate = Earnings After Taxes / Net Sales

16. Turnover of Total Operating Assets Ratio
This ratio tracks over investment in operating assets. Trend analysis indicates direction of any change.

Turnover of Total Operating Assets = Net Sales / Total Operating Assets

BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION

Financial Jeopardy and the Use of the "Z-Score"

The failure prediction model provides a means to assess a firm's financial health in terms of the probability of future bankruptcy. This model employs a multiple discriminant analysis of five significant financial ratios to calculate an overall "Z- Score."

Z-Score =1/2a + 1.4b +3.3c + 0.6d +1.0e,

where:

a = Working Capital to Total Assets = Net Working Capital

This ratio measures net liquid assets relative to total capitalization. Consistent operating losses will cause shrinking current assets relative to total assets.

b = Retained Earnings to Total Assets = Retained Earnings / Total Assets

This ratio measures a firm's success in using its total asset base to generate earnings. However, manipulated retain earnings data can distort the numerical results.

c = EBIT to Total Assets = EBIT / Total Assets

The earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to total assets ratio, or the rate of return on assets, measures the productivity of a firm's assets. Maximizing this rate is not the same as maximizing the rate of return on equity, since different degrees of leverage can affect conclusions.

d = Equity to Debt = (Market Value of Common + Preferred Stock) / (Total Current Debt + Long Term Debt)

This ratio shows the amount a firm's assets can decline in value before liabilities exceed assets and the firm becomes insolvent.

e = Sales to Total Assets = Total Sales / Total Assets

This ratio is a measure of the firm's ability to generate sales.

The "Z-Score" is a test to determine whether additional analysis is required, not an end in itself. It is best to plot the "Z-Score" over time and compare it with averages for the industry. A firm may have had a constantly low "Z-Score" for years and still have performed satisfactorily.

Z- Score Interpretation

Professor Altman's data indicates that:

Z Score Prediction

3.00 or more Little chance of bankruptcy

1.81 to 2.99 Some chance of bankruptcy

1.80 or less Large chance of bankruptcy

It is noted that variants to Professor Altman's "Z-Score" formula have been calculated for a number of industries. The analyst should examine the databases used to develop these models before placing too much reliance on them.
Source: http://guidebook.dcma.mil